What's Wrong With This Picture: A Hearse With Well Hung Woodchipper?
The Phantom of the Opera is there.... inside your mind...
The Good and Evil of Religion
For whatever good religion produces, it's the only thing you'll ever hear the religious talk about, so once people start acting evil, nobody expects what's coming, and the churches are filled with evil people using this fact as asshole camouflage.
I'll the first to say that religion not only serves a purpose, but is essential to the building of civilization from a barbaric paradigm. There could be no civilization without it, and there is plenty of good that people use it for that could not be made possible in any other way. Based on that view I share with the religious, it's also where we part ways, because that because the premise upon which the religious justify never talking about the evil behavior specific to religion, and I say the evil really, REALLY matters, because without recognizing and discussing that evil, one enables all manner of evil behavior, and the proof of that is everywhere.
It is frequently said that all that's necessary for evil to succeed is for good people to do nothing--and nowhere is that more true than with religion. When we look the other way with utterly monstrous behavior, we become the very instrument of the worst behaviors in society that we condemn most. Can we be truly righteous while recognizing only that evil we're instructed to by those profiting from selective enforcement?
Indeed, I feel it no exaggeration whatsoever to say that the truly religious feel an obligation to cleanse religion of evil behavior, and that begins by at least talking about it--which by extension also argues just how many of those who present as devoutly religious, are not religious at all, they're just the sheep and wolves we see in every paradigm, either exploiting or being exploited by eachother, and all under the pretext of being profoundly religious.
Of course, this almost certainly leads to immediate conflict, and of course, part of the benefit of religion is to have a place where people can learn their lessons on how the world works where there is no punishment for getting it wrong. That's actually an extremely important function of religion, and it's an excellent reason to try to take as positive a view of everything as we can.
It's not my fault the rules are set against eachother, and both tolerance and judgement are necessary for one to have an undeceived perspective.
I feel like exploring this, and it will likely lead to enormous conflict, but that's the nature of the quest for truth--if you're serious about it, you do what's necessary to understand the truth.
If there's one thing that is constantly pushed for in religion, it's the importance of the truth and the refraining from and resistance to deception.
Are we truly religious, or is it just a bunch of bullshit? If we're serious about the truth and deception, then the only path forward is to work out the truth and lies of it all--otherwise we're just enabling deception.
So, here we go...
Should the Radical Anti-Semite Martin Luther King Memorial Be Torn Down?
With the Black Lynch Mob tearing down statues for any reason they feel like and just calling it "racism," why not the Martin Luther King memorial as well, using the same logic?
After all, only a radical racist would revere Martin Luther enough to change his name and his child's name to match it, and if ANYTHING counts as support, it's naming your child after someone. Nobody would argue that if he named his child "Hitler," and yet Hitler was deeply inspired by Martin Luther's abomination of a race-hatred manual.
As one of the most staunch racists in history, Martin Luther wrote a book "The Jews And Their Lies" which firmly inspired Hitler, was second in publication only to Mein Kampf in Nazi Germany, and was used by the Nazis at Nuremberg to argue the Holocaust as a defense of Christianity.
What kind of racist asshole would try to perpetuate the legacy of a such a horrible racist?
Isn't it time to end the racist legacy of Martin Luther King, and throw his statues into the sea?--or should we maybe stop attacking everything in sight because something about history pisses us off?
Or is racism totally okay with black people as long as a wholesale massacre of millions of Jews doesn't affect black people? Dismissing the racism of Martin Luther enough to name his own child after him out of admiration because it doesn't affect black people, despite his help in setting up the Holocaust argues that MLK never gave a shit about actual racism--he just cared about his own race's inconvenience, which doesn't make him special. We ALL care about how OUR people are inconvenienced.
It wasn't ignorance, because MLK actually went to Germany to study Martin Luther, and knew his history in profound detail.
Like it or not, Martin Luther King was the textbook definition of ANTI-SEMITE, and like his namesake, was one of the most staunch racists in history.
https://www.wikiwand.com/en/On_the_Jews_and_Their_Lies
https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/martin-luther-quot-the-jews-and-their-lies-quot
Cirque du Soleil Lillypad Statue Dance
Cute Animal Gifs and Videos Therapy
With the world off its axis, I'd like to take some time to enjoy some cute happy animals, which always brightens my spirits.
Post your favorite photos and videos of cute animals being happy and enjoying themselves. :)
Drones Are RIGHT NOW Changing The Entire Paradigm Of War
The moratorium on AI controlled weapons will only stop those we can enforce it with. That rules out every government outside the US. China, Russia, North Korea, Iran, and every other shithole full of rich madmen with cutting edge technology already have this weaponry to attack the United States with. This is not a future possibility, this is a present reality, and when they strike with it, the change will not be gradual over years, everything will change overnight.
Under normal circumstances, I would end this message with my routine maxim, "Prevention is the only victory worth having." Unfortunately it does not apply here, because it cannot be prevented. Unless I'm wrong, which I would be delighted to be, there is no technological means of stopping this weaponry, nor any legal means, as the governments outside the US will not stop themselves, and that means we are vulnerable as long as we do not develop them first.
Either way is going to be a shitshow--but a very interesting shitshow that will make the news a lot more entertaining for those who survive.


.png)
.png)



.jpg)


.png)




.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)